000 03278nam a2200337 i 4500
005 20260112063325.0
010 _a2014-012308
020 _a9781476777702
039 _a202504231501
_bstaff
_c202111101650
_d staff
_c201607081618
_d staff
_c201601061201
_d staff
_y 201601061058
_z staff
043 _ae------
_an-us---
050 _aHB3717 2008
_b.G337 2014
082 _a330.90511
_bGAL [ Shelf 3 ]
100 _aGalbraith, James K.
245 _aThe end of normal :
_bthe great crisis and the future of growth /
_cJames K. Galbraith.
250 _aFirst Simon & Schuster hardcover edition.
260 _aNew York :
_bSimon & Schuster,
_c2014.
300 _ax, 291 pages ;
_c24 cm
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 267-276) and index.
520 _a"The years since the Great Crisis of 2008 have seen slow growth, high unemployment, falling home values, chronic deficits, a deepening disaster in Europe--and a stale argument between two false solutions, "austerity" on one side and "stimulus" on the other. Both sides and practically all analyses of the crisis so far take for granted that the economic growth from the early 1950s until 2000--interrupted only by the troubled 1970s--represented a normal performance. From this perspective the crisis was an interruption, caused by bad policy or bad people, and full recovery is to be expected if the cause is corrected. The End of Normal challenges this view. Placing the crisis in perspective, Galbraith argues that the 1970s already ended the age of easy growth. The 1980s and 1990s saw only uneven growth, with rising inequality within and between countries. And the 2000s saw the end even of that--despite frantic efforts to keep growth going with tax cuts, war spending, and financial deregulation. When the crisis finally came, stimulus and automatic stabilization were able to place a floor under economic collapse. But they are not able to bring about a return to high growth and full employment. Today, four factors impede a return to normal. They are the rising costs of real resources, the now-evident futility of military power, the labor-saving consequences of the digital revolution, and the breakdown of law and ethics in the financial sector. The Great Crisis should be seen as a turning point, a barometer of the rise of unstable economic conditions, which should be regarded as the new normal. Policies and institutions going forward should be designed, above all, modestly, to cope with this fact, maintaining conditions for a good life in difficult times"--
_cProvided by publisher.
650 _aGlobal Financial Crisis, 2008-2009.
650 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economic History.
_2 bisacsh
650 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Economic Conditions.
_2 bisacsh
650 _aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Economic Policy.
_2 bisacsh
651 _aEurope
_x Economic conditions
_y 20th century.
651 _aEurope
_x Economic policy
_y 20th century.
651 _aUnited States
_x Economic conditions
_y 20th century.
651 _aUnited States Economic policy
_y 20th century.
991 _aVIRTUA40
991 _aVTLSSORT0080*0100*0200*0430*0500*0820*1000*2450*2500*2600*3000*5040*5200*6500*6501*6502*6503*6510*6511*6512*6513*9992
909 _a5541
999 _c4999
_d4999